SPDX vs CycloneDX
Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) are critical for managing software transparency and security. Provides a structured approach to capture and communicate details about software components, including their origin, license, and potential vulnerabilities.
Each SBOM format has specific strengths and use cases:
- SPDX
- CycloneDX

SPDX (Software Package Data Exchange): A mature and comprehensive SBOM format designed for detailed software component descriptions, offering a rich vocabulary to capture information such as licenses, copyrights, and relationships between components.
Sample SPDX Format:
{
"SPDXID": "SPDXRef-Package-A",
"name": "example-lib",
"versionInfo": "1.2.3",
"downloadLocation": "https://example.com/example-lib-1.2.3.tgz",
"licenseConcluded": "Apache-2.0",
"checksums": [
{ "algorithm": "SHA256", "checksumValue": "abc123..." }
]
}
CycloneDX: A lightweight and user-friendly SBOM format that emphasizes simplicity, focusing on essential component data including identification, versioning, and vulnerabilities.
Sample CycloneDX Format:
{
"bomFormat": "CycloneDX",
"specVersion": "1.6",
"components": [
{
"type": "library",
"name": "example-lib",
"version": "1.2.3",
"purl": "pkg:npm/example-lib@1.2.3",
"hashes": [
{ "alg": "SHA-256", "content": "abc123..." }
]
}
],
"dependencies": [
{ "ref": "pkg:npm/example-lib@1.2.3", "dependsOn": [] }
]
}
SBOM Formats Comparison: SPDX vs CycloneDX
Factor | SPDX | CycloneDX |
---|---|---|
Maintainer | Linux Foundation | OWASP |
Supported Formats | Tag/Value, JSON, XML, YAML, RDF | JSON, XML, protobuf |
Focus Area | Legal compliance, licensing, and IP due diligence with detailed file and package metadata | Security and vulnerability tracking with strong support for dependency trees and VEX |
License Metadata | Extensive license expression support using SPDX license list | Basic license information; includes SPDX identifiers but less detailed |
Vulnerability Handling | Relies on external tools for vulnerability mapping | Native support for vulnerability data, VEX, hashing, and dependency relationships |
Limitations | Less suited for automated vulnerability tracking; weaker dependency modeling | Less suited for legal/IP compliance; limited licensing detail |
Ideal Use Case | Compliance audits, IP due diligence, detailed SBOM report | Security-focused SBOMs, vulnerability tracking, supply chain risk analysis |
FAQs: SPDX vs CycloneDX
Which SBOM format should I choose for security scanning?
CycloneDX is better suited for security-focused use cases because it natively supports VEX, hashing, and dependency trees.
Which SBOM format is better for license compliance audits?
SPDX is the preferred choice for legal teams, IP due diligence, and licensing compliance due to its extensive license expression support.
Do both formats support all programming languages and package ecosystems?
Both formats support major ecosystems such as npm, Maven, PyPI, Ruby, Go packages, and more. Support may vary depending on the SBOM generation tool.